Monday, December 19, 2011
by Dan Crosby
of THE DAILY PEN
Des Moines, IA – More than half of Iowa Republicans do not believe Barack Obama is eligible to be president says a recent poll.
A Public Policy Polling survey taken December 16th through December 18th reveals that 52 percent of GOP voters in the Electoral lead-off state believe that Obama is either not a Natural Born citizen or they have doubts about Obama’s natal eligibility to hold the office of president.
While asking the respondent if they believe Obama was born in the U.S., the poll does not ask if the respondent is aware that Obama’s alleged father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth or if the respondent knows the definition of a Natural Born Citizen.
Historical and legal precedence warrants that natal geography is only one of three determining factors of Natural-born citizenship. The other determining factors are the citizenship status of both parents at the time of the birth, and the continuity of Natural-born status of the candidate from birth to election.
Along with Obama’s unsubstantiated birth place documentation, it has been proven that Obama’s father, Barack Obama Sr., was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth and there is documented evidence that Obama lost his Natural-born status when he left the United States and was adopted as an Indonesian citizen by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro in 1967. The culmination of these facts renders Barack Obama an illegitimate president of the United States and criminal usurper of the office.
The poll shows that 31 percent of the nearly 600 respondents are certain that Obama is not a natural born citizen while another 21 percent have doubts about his Constitutional eligibility based solely on the question of his place of birth, not his foreign parentage or loss of continuity.
Interestingly, 65% of those surveyed said they do not have a favorable opinion of the Republican establishment in Washington D.C., yet, despite this political dissuasion, 56% of them are still not convinced Obama is a legitimate President. This indicates a growing trend that voters are becoming more aware of Obama’s ineligibility apart from party-based media propaganda and are more willing to separate their political affiliations from the facts about Obama’s biography. Democrats are growing less likely to accept Obama’s claim that he is constitutionally eligible.
The poll also shows that Government spending/National debt is the biggest concern of those surveyed (37%), not ecomony/jobs (30%) as government officials falsely portray.
Indicative of public consciousness about Obama’s past, nearly 1 in 7 respondents who voted for Obama’s party in the 2008 Caucus are at least doubtful that Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, according to the poll.
This poll was not paid for or authorized by any campaign or political organization. PPP surveys are conducted through automated telephone interviews. PPP is a Democratic polling company, but the New York Times portrayed its surveys in 2010 as being slightly biased toward Republican candidates.
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Arizona resident and guest editorialist
for The Daily Pen
MESA, AZ. - Maricopa County Arizona Sheriff, Joe Arpaio, represents everything Barack Obama hates.
From Obama's perspective, the Sheriff is a legitimately elected, constitutionally eligible, white, middle-aged, vintage American endowed with the legal authority of his office to enforce immigration laws in a state which happens to share a border with a foreign country which is a major source of illegal immigrants and, therefore, votes for Obama. It doesn't matter to Obama that Sheriff Arpaio is right.
Yep, its becoming more apparent why Obama hates Arpaio, indeed. At least Arpaio is a natural-born citizen.
In the absence of political support by American citizens (Obama’s approval rating is around 35%) who, by the way, are legal residents, and given the fact that he is an ineligible, illegal candidate himself, Barack Obama is desperate for the Latino vote in the looming 2012 election.
Therefore, it begs the question. How does an illegal alien become eligible to vote? The same way an illegal candidate like Obama becomes president. First, get a criminal organization like ACORN to forge voting registrations. If that doesn't work, hurl guilt, shame and elitist accusations of ignorance at the Joe Arpaios of the world, who possess the right of authority endowed by their constituents, the local people and communities they serve.
The goal, taken right from Saul 'Diablo' Alinski's "Rules for Radicals" is to make them believe they don’t deserve authority more than those who never had the right to have it in the first place. This is how Obama and his minions have convinced the stanchions of power in America to believe his lies. Rather than tell the truth, they simply implement a vile campaign of guilt, shame and a benign standard of fairness based on bleeding heart, liberal lies and social justice advocacy.
How did America become so tragically obedient to such derangement?
Obama, a minority community organizer since the 1990’s, was so outraged by Arizona's Immigration Law (SB 1070), he ordered his Department of Justice to file a legal challenge, questioning its constitutionality. Nevermind this is the very same Obama administration who self-righteously deemed constitutional and passed a salaciously wrought federal health insurance mandate law, (which is illegal foremost because it was signed by an unconstitutional president), which unconstitutionally forces all free citizens of the United States to purchase something whether they want or need it, or not. Essentially, Obamacare is state sponsered slavery because the resources used by Americans to pay for Obamacare must be earned by their labor. The only way to opt out of Obamacare is to dispossess one's own body. In other words, in order to choose not to have health insurance under Obamacare, you must die! If Obamacare doesn't violate one's inalienable right to life and liberty, nothing does.
Since Obama’s disastrous administration refused to enforce federal immigration laws, Arizona was forced to pass its own comprehensive state statute to protect its citizens. In the wake of Mexican drug smuggling and violence on the border which resulted the deaths of at least four American citizens at the hands of illegal aliens, one being an Arizona rancher who was murdered on his own land, the Arizona law was still thoughtfully constructed to address the illegal immigration problem in Arizona while also stipulating that “racial profiling” in routine policing will not be tolerated. Remember, this law was created by Arizona because Obama's administration failed to enforce laws which already exist. Obama's failure to lead resulted in American citizens taking their own protection into their own hands.
Aside from the political argument, why any law abiding, legally residing Latino citizen of the United States would not consider it a privilege to have the opportunity to display the record of their American citizenry to police is a question Obama’s ignorance prevents him from asking. Latinos should be insulted by Obama for assuming that their community automatically supports illegal behavior by other Latinos. What kind of leader uses such racial generalities with such shallow political calculations? A community organizer bent on social justice and his own power, that’s who. Latinos are seen as nothing more than votes in 2012 to Obama. He could not care less about the Latino culture, their families or their welfare in places like Arizona. This complaint is nothing more than a political play by a man who is not even legally eligible to hold his own office, let alone defend the illegality of others in a place where he has absolutely no jurisdiction.
Sadly, Obama has been very successful in taking advantage of a ripe, socially dysfunctional time in America. Lasciviously, he has been effective in using blame, shame and slander to deceive the U.S. courts, Congress and the media into a delusional passivity about his unconstitutional status as a president. He and his momentary transient majority have actually leveraged the weight of lies and a social justice agenda by shaming enough ignorant white liberals into going along with a minority message that a black man deserved to be President, regardless of his eligibility or blatant intentions to implement the largest communist dictatorship ever attempted inside American borders.
Then, like Satan was able to deceive Eve in the garden of Eden, Obama convinced an immoral media and soulless co-political class, to not challenge or rule against his illegitimate candidacy using the rule of law, despite the fact that Obama is not a Natural born citizen and, therefore, not a constitutionally legitimate candidate. Obama slithered on into the White House like he owned it, simply casting aside generation of blood-ransom paid by worthier ascendants throughout our righteous and battle hardened history.
Now, with those carcasses in the bag, Obama is taking aim at the heart of vintage America which is symbolized in the mind of an obotic liberal vestige as a man just like Sheriff Joe Arpaio. After all, if Obama cannot circumvent the opposition of a legitimate American public by legitimizing the illegal votes of border jumpers and bean pickers, he must attack the authority of the very individuals who legally and constitutionally protect the people of the United States from them. People like Joe Arpaio.
Understanding these three prerequisites, it is not surprising to see what Obama is doing now.
The illegitimate Obama administration’s Justice Department, led by Eric “Fast-n-Furious” Holder, announced a complaint against Arizona municipal Sheriff, Joe Arpaio in the wake of a three-year DOJ investigation of the sheriff’s lawful and successful enforcement of illegal immigration laws in his state. The results of the investigation were announced on the anniversary of the murder of border patrol agent, Brian Terry, who was killed on the American border by drug smuggling Mexicans possessing assault weapons supplied to them by the Obama administration.
In response to the DOJ investigation and complaint, Arpaio vows to fight what appears to be typical liberal charges of racism against a white elected official. The timing of the complaint is also wrought with politically strategized accusations immediately following the Supreme Courts agreement to hear the case concerning Arizona SB 1070 Immigration Enforcement Law.
In a press conference this week, Arpaio made the following statement:
“Before we get started today, I want to say something to the citizens of Arizona and the rest of the nation.
On the surface, it may appear that today’s findings and actions by our federal government are directed towards this Sheriff and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. The truth of the matter is that this is a sad day for America as a whole.
Today, the federal government moved to do everything it can to put this agency out of the illegal immigration enforcement business.
We are proud of the work we have done to fight illegal immigration. We have been responsible for finding and identifying 25% of the nation’s illegal alien criminal offenders through the 287G program. Sadly, much of that work will no longer be permitted by the Obama administration.
Today the federal government cancelled our 287 G agreement. What that means is that we are no longer able to verify the immigration status of any criminal offender brought into our jails. This was a program responsible for detecting over 44,000 illegal alien criminal offenders since 2007, many of whom we can assume were deported by ICE officials back to their country of origin.
Now with the cancellation of this agreement, illegal criminal offenders arrested and brought into my jails will go undetected and ultimately dumped back onto a street near you. For that, you can thank your federal government.
By their actions today, President Obama and his band of merry men might as well erect their very own pink neon sign at the Arizona-Mexico border saying Welcome All Illegals to your United States.... Our home is your home.
On Sept 28, 2011, President Obama was questioned at the White House, by Hispanic journalist and asked why there was no resolution in the civil rights investigation against me for allegedly racially profiling Hispanics. He stated that he had to be careful to comment on individual cases handled by the DOJ. The president stated he challenged the AZ Law (1070) that was supported by me, because he thought there was a great danger of naturalized citizens with Latino surnames could potentially be vulnerable to questioning.
It is interesting that after 100 days in Office by President Obama, that the Democrat Chairmen of the judiciary Committee in Congress initiated this investigation.
After all this time, the head of the DOJ Civil Rights Division, who reports to Attorney General Holder, held a press conference December 15, 2011, which is 2 days after the Supreme Court agreed to accept the 1070 lawsuit.
It’s also interesting that Perez came to Phoenix for the press conference on the anniversary of the brave border patrol agent Brian Terry’s death, who was killed because of the failed Justice department’s “Fast and Furious” case, which is presently holding hearings this week on Attorney General Eric Holder.
Just this week, two Democrat Latino US Congress men from Arizona, joined by several other Latino Legislatures want me to resign my office. All of these same Democratic elected officials, throughout the years, have been criticizing my enforcement of State and Federal Illegal immigration laws.
Candidates for President of the United States - Herman Cain and Michelle Bachmann recently visited me in my office, Texas Governor Rick Perry and Mitt Romney also called me – all interested in my successful enforcement of illegal immigration and asked for my endorsement.
Recently in New Hampshire, I endorsed Texas Governor Rick Perry for President of the United States. It should be noted that all this political activity made national news.
The Justice Department takes issues with our policies in the jails - it should be noted, the US Marshall Office, under the Department of Justice, gave my Office high marks. In the past when we did a crime suppression operation in Guadalupe, high homeland security officials were present and praised us for my operations stating we performed in a professional manner, even though this operation caused some controversy in that town.
We have a civil rights racial profiling case brought by the ACLU, which will be before a federal judge with oral argument on summary judgment next week. Is the DOJ press conference, among other reasons, geared to poison the court against our position in this civil rights case?”
Monday, December 12, 2011
TOP WASHINGTON D.C. CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER: "A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS ONE WHO IS BORN TO A MOTHER AND A FATHER WHO ARE UNITED STATES CITIZENS"
by Daniel Crosby
of The Daily Pen
New York, NY – Apologists and abettors of the most prolific political crime in American history have attempted for more than five years to conceal the facts about the birth and life of the man known as “Barack Obama”. Now, as part of an ever increasing consensus and growing body of evidence, a formal declaration by one of America’s most experienced legal professionals and a highly respected practitioner of Constitutional law thrusts a dagger of truth into the heart of the obotic deception.
“Barack Obama does not qualify as a natural born citizen to hold the office of the Presidency,” declares Dr. Herbert W. Titus, J.D., a Constitutional law expert with more than 30 years of experience serving as a juris counsel and partner with William J. Olson Attorneys in Washington D.C.
“The question of Obama’s birth…where he was born…is an important question. But, the more important question is whether or not he is a ‘natural born’ citizen because he was born in Hawaii,” says Dr. Titus.
“The conventional wisdom is, ‘…if he can produce a birth certificate showing he was born in Hawaii, that would make him a natural born citizen…’ That is not true. That only makes him a ‘citizen by birth’, and there is a distinction between these two terms (‘natural born citizen’ and ‘citizen by birth’).”
Dr. Titus continues, “A ‘citizen by birth’ is a person who becomes a citizen because he was born within the geographical limits of the United States…and the parents were here lawfully…and therefore, by birth, he is a citizen. Now that’s because, in the first sentence of the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution, it states specifically that a person who is born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, is a citizen.”
Dr. Titus specifically addresses the misrepresentation of the relationship between the 14th Amendment and Article 2 of the Constitution. Many of Obama’s ignorant defenders attempt to argue in favor of Obama’s natural born status by associating his citizenship with the requirements prescribed by the 14th Amendment.
Dr. Titus then explains why the 14th Amendment fails to ascribe ‘natural born’ citizenship to anyone.
“Most people think that (the 14th Amendment) is a definition of a ‘natural born’ citizen, but people forget that the 14th Amendment was put into the Constitution not for the purpose of defining what a ‘natural born’ citizen is, as it applies to the president of the United States, but it was placed in the Constitution for the specific purpose of declaring that people who were part of the newly freed ‘slave class’ (in 1865) were citizens of the United States, and of the state in which they resided.”
Dr. Titus explains that the 14th Amendment was subsequent to the United States Supreme Court ruling in the Dredd Scott case in that a person who had been brought to the United States against their will could never become a citizen of the United States, much less a citizen of the state. This decision was made to prevent anyone from being forced to become a citizen if they did not want to. However, the decision was remiss in that it did not address those who were in the United States without citizenship to any nation and were not able to reintegrate.
Dr. Titus continues, “So, the place of birth which gives rise to ‘citizenship by birth’ was addressed to the question of what to do with this entirely new group of people who would otherwise be ‘stateless’, because they could not, under the Dredd Scott rule, become a citizen having been born in the United States.”
Dr. Titus’ explains that the chronological precedence of a ‘natural born’ citizen as it was predetermined by Article 2 of the Constitution draws a distinction from the era of ‘citizenship by birth’ as defined by the later 14th Amendment because Article 2 was in the Constitution 100 years before the 14th Amendment was ever included in the Constitution. This fact dooms Obama eligibility sympathizers who attach natural born citizenship to the 14th Amendment.
“Natural born citizen, as it relates to the Office of the President, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning,” says Dr. Titus, “The 14th Amendment’s definition of ‘citizenship by birth’ was not addressed at all to the question of one’s qualification to run for President of the United States. Even the language is different. It talks about a ‘Natural Born’ citizen.”
Those born of freed slaves after 1865 were not ‘natural born’ citizens because there were determined by the Dredd Scott ruling to not be citizens against their will.
Dr. Titus goes on to confirm the historical consensus of how a natural born citizen is defined by natural law, “What is a natural born citizen? Well, there is a law of the nature of citizenship, and if you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in some constitution or statute.”
Dr. Titus then makes a profound confirmation about natural born citizenry which has been well established by historical law, for centuries. He says a natural born citizen is one who holds such status because of the very nature of their birth and how the circumstance of that birth relates to the nations in which we are born. This is a very significant understanding because, as Dr. Titus describes, it draws a distinction between those who might never find citizenship with any nation due to either voluntary or involuntary circumstances, and “your relationship to the nation as a citizen.”
This is profound because only a President, among all other position of American government, is required to be a natural born citizen. Therefore, only a president must be born under circumstances which prevent him or her from being subject to any circumstance, voluntary or involuntary, which might disqualify them from a full and verifiable ‘natural born’ status.
Dr. Titus explains that, order to determine whether someone is a natural born citizen, we must understand the “laws of nature” as they apply to one being born into citizenship. These laws are those which are subject not only to the geographic location of birth, but, most importantly, to the biological identity of the birth. The citizenship status of the mother and the father at the time of birth.
“That is precisely what a natural born citizen is. One who is born to a father and a mother, each of whom is a citizen of the United States…” says Dr. Titus.
“What we have learned from Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is that Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was. But, Obama does not qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of the presidency.”
The Daily Pen’s editor, Penbrook Johannson, echos Dr. Titus’ mordant exposition, “It’s funny. Many people ask, in reference to defending Obama, ‘What if a candidate does not know who their father or mother is? Does that disqualify them?’ In the case of being president of the United States…’Yes, it does.’”
Johannson expounds, “In their ignorant prejudices, Obots fail to see the exclusivity requirement in citizenship for the president, while completely failing to realize that such a candidate is permitted to serve in any other capacity in our government. The first condition is too strict, but the second is not good enough. They are hypocrites and ingrates. They want a pristine constitution to protect their selfish sense of entitlement, but when that same rule disqualifies them from their selfish grandeur, they seek sophomoric and illegal recompense. It’s quite disgusting.”
As we proceed toward the 2012 election, remember, this is the most revealing part of the liberal establishment’s true ideology about Obama’s eligibility. They have sold their souls to the vile edict that Barack Obama is entitled to be president, regardless of whether or not he is lawfully eligible. This is their premier symbol of the 50 year long reparative justice movement. Entitlement based on a cultivation of hatred for those who have what they do not have.
Moreover, they express nothing less than a haughty contempt for the Natural Born citizenship requirement. It is this very contempt which will unleash a savage justice wrought with wrath and blood ransomed redemption.
Those kept in the cage of liberalism exist in and feed upon a delusion that Obama was elected by a majority and, therefore, a majority a president makes. Lasciviously, thought, they refuse to be saved by the righteous truth that Obama would have never been elected by a majority if that majority had known beforehand that he was never eligible to hold the office in the first place.
Dr. Herbert W. Titus currently serves in counsel to the law firm of William J. Olson, P.C. Prior to his association with this firm, Mr. Titus taught constitutional and common law for nearly 30 years at five different ABA approved law schools. From 1986 to 1993, he served as the founding Dean of the College of Law and Government at Regent University. Prior to his academic career, he served as a Trial Attorney and a Special Assistant United States Attorney with the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and Kansas City, Missouri. Today he is engaged in a general practice with a concentration in constitutional strategy, litigation, and appeals.
Mr. Titus holds the J.D. degree (cum laude) from Harvard and the B.S. degree in Political Science from the University of Oregon from which he graduated Phi Beta Kappa. He is an active member of the bar of Virginia and an inactive member of the bar of Oregon. He is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the United States Court of Claims, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth, District of Columbia and Federal Circuits. His constitutional practice has taken him into federal district courts in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia and the state courts of Idaho, Texas and North Dakota.
Friday, December 2, 2011
by Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen
NEW YORK, NY – Jack Maskell is a liar and we have proven it. Someone wiser needs to tell him that shillery only compounds deviance.
First of all, however, let's understand the psychology of a man like Jack Maskell before we even discuss what he has attempted with is recent, delusional CRS memo in defense of Obama's fraudulent presidency.
When those who have committed epic crimes against humanity are, as a natural consequence, beginning to suffer the wrath they have created by such actions, they will often, as a final plea, forcefully and desperately attempt to over-intellectualize and elevate the reasons for their criminality by dismissing the validity of the original and fundamental truth which they have violated. Essentially, they attempt to deceive authority by making the reasons for their deviant behavior seem more complicated than our moral ability to comprehend, and therefore, they try to make the reasons for their destructive behavior the result of their "elite" understanding of righteousness and nobility.
In the end, though, we all know Obama is a liar, a criminal and a thief...and Maskell is just another abettor.
This behavior is a common defense mechanism which all living creatures attempt when the consequences of their foul actions become bigger than their ability to control them, or be accountable for them. This is not unique to fallen man. Even as early as the first moments of creation, Satan himself dismissed the validity of God’s constitution when he propositioned mankind to consider what God had intended, rather than what God had actually commanded not to do. Essentially, Satan masterfully and harmfully created a distinction between our behavior within the security of loving rulership and the motives of that rulership, causing us to doubt the consequences of violating the rules. Even then, the natural consequences of that single, historic violation of pristine rule led to three separate denials of responsibility on the part of three suspects along with division, hostility and the downfall of an entire species, as they blamed one another for their own transgression.
Tragically, reaching beyond the lies and crimes is always the irreparable damage to an essential alliance. Like the one between government and the people. For the first time, we became vulnerable to death and loss, having exceeded the moorings of our doctrinal commissions of safety, freedom, provision and security, by violating one simple command from our ultimate constitutional authority.
In the same spirit of Satan’s original aim, Legislative Attorney, Jack Maskell’s recent release through the Congressional Research Service of a document called, “Qualifications For President and the ‘Natural Born’ Citizen Requirement ” carries nothing more than the same millennial legacy of legalized deception into the realm of presidential eligibility, and even deeper into covert power mongering, usurpation and political horror.
In his 50+ page delusion, Maskell attempts to do one simple thing. He is acting as an Obama lobbyist to diminish the impact that Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen. That's it. Not very sexy, is it? However, even a propagandist like Maskell understands the cataclysmic impact this has on Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of the presidency. Even a dreg like Maskell understand that if the ramifications of such biological facts about Obama reaches the domain of consciousness in the collective mind of courageous authority, the subsequent logic of the legal mandate will ensue and Obama and his Obotic minions will go down in history as the most prolific political criminal enterprise in human history.
On page 48 of his memo, Maskell writes, "In one case concerning the identity of a petitioner, the Supreme Court of the United States explained that "it is not disputed that if petitioner is the son” of two Chinese national citizens who were physically in the United States when petitioner was born, then he is “a natural born American citizen ….”
Quoting Case history, Maskell also includes the following from Kwok Jan Fat v. White, 253 U.S. 454, 457 (1920):
"The Supreme Court also noted that It is better that many Chinese immigrants should be improperly admitted than that one natural born citizen of the United States should be permanently excluded from his country.” 253 U.S. at 464.
Upon reviewing the actual case, we find that the Supreme Court said no such thing. Actually, contrary to Maskell's blatant lies, we find that the petitioner was actually born to U.S. citizen parents, not Chinese citizens. The father was born in the United States and was a citizen by virtue of precedence set by US v. Wong Kim Ark. His mother was an American citizen by marriage to the father when the child was born.
Pathetically, Maskell also attempts to hinge his argument on the accusation that the petitioner had illegally acquired a false identity and that the citizen parents were not actually his real parents. The Supreme Court rejected the State’s "undisclosed" evidence on this point and conducted their citizenship analysis based on the assumption these were petitioner’s real parents. Therefore, having been born in the US of parents who were citizens, petitioner was indeed a natural-born citizen.
Maskell attempts to make it appear as if the petitioner was born of alien parents in order to illustrate that a person who was born of "foreign biology" was determined by the highest court to be a natural born citizen. This is a bald faced lie, and that makes Maskell a liar and a shill for Obama.
In fact, the Supreme Court ruled that the petitioner was a natural born citizen because, in fact, he WAS born to two U.S. citizen parents, not that he was a natural born citizen in spite of being born to foreigners.
Let's take a closer look at Maskell's drudgery. First, his use of quotation marks and their strategic positioning is an attempt to deceive the reader into believing that the entire quote is from the Supreme Court decision. It is not!
“It is not disputed that if petitioner is the son…”
This is the genuine part of the quote from the Court’s opinion. Now, the lies begin. Notice the next two parts are not in quotation marks:
.....of two Chinese national citizens who were physically in the United States when petitioner was born, then he is.....
Notice here that Maskell doesn't actually state that the parents are citizens of China. Instead he uses the words CHINESE NATIONAL, knowing they are actually U.S. citizens who had immigrated from China at the time of the birth. Of course they were Chinese nationals! But they were immigrants who had become U.S. citizens!
Maskell's lies continue as he then shamelessly plugs the idea that natal geography plays the only role in determining natural born citizenship when he says, 'who were PHYSICALLY IN THE UNITED STATES WHEN PETITIONER WAS BORN..'
Maskell desperately wants his readers to believe that, based on this precedence, since Obama was allegedly born in Hawaii, though that has never been shown by any authority, it should not matter that his father was a citizen of Kenya (British Protectorate of East Africa) in 1961. Maskell wants his readers to accept the lie that Obama is a natural born citizen simply based on his geographic birth place, not his natal biology.
Unfortunately, for Maskell, Obama is a perfect example of the very candidate they intended to disqualify with the constitutional eligibilty clause. His father was even British for god's sake. If Obama had tried to run for president in 1787 using these tactics, he would have been arrested and executed as an enemy spy secretly working for the British crown! The irony in that fact is historically breathtaking.
Then Maskell jerry-rigs a benign excerpt from the case which has no connection to his previous line:
“a natural born American citizen ….”
When you see written in Maskell's propagandized memo, this is what it looks like:
"…the Supreme Court of the United States explained that “[i]t is not disputed that if petitioner is the son” of two Chinese national citizens who were physically in the United States when petitioner was born, then he is “a natural born American citizen ….”
Unfortunately for Maskell and abettors like him, the Supreme Court never said this!!!! Here is what the court actually decided about the case:
“It is not disputed that if petitioner is the son of Kwock Tuck Lee and his wife, Tom Ying Shee, he was born to them when they were permanently domiciled in the United States, is a citizen thereof, and is entitled to admission to the country. United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 , 18 Sup. Ct. 456.” Kwok Jan Fat v. White, 253 U.S. 454, 457 (1920).
Jack Maskell is an unadulterated liar. As presented in the memo, Maskell avoids the inconvenient truth that the Court took direct notice of the authorities having established that the petitioner’s father was born in the US and that he was a voter, saying, “…the father of the boy was native born and was a voter in that community.” Id. at 460.
Maskell never mentions that the father and mother were US citizens at the time of petitioner’s birth in California.
This deceiptful attempt to convey an argument based on a lie guts Maskell of his credibility as an attorney and reduces his memo to nothing more than thumbs up for a bad movie. The memo is propaganda meant to prop Obama failing attempts to conceal the truth about his identity.
Maskell exploits the Congressional Research Service moniker as lipstick on his pro-Obama pig. Maskell makes no effort to address Obama’s offense against the blood-ransomed, constitutional freedoms endowed to generations of vintage American people. Instead, he attempts to promote considerations for our founder’s intentions by implying they would have used a different language in the ‘Natural Born’ Eligibility Clause had they known a man, so worthy and entitled, like Obama were to seek the presidency in the future.
Maskell, rather than err on the side of distinction by promoting the blatant command of our forefathers’ pristine authority which says that only the most loyal, comprehensive and exclusive of citizenship may be eligible to be president, or suggest measures for amending what he clearly believes is an absurd rule, attempts to propel a deceptive and creeping warrant which challenges the definition and intended meaning of the words “natural born” used by the framers of our Constitution. Unfortunately for Maskell, this merely indicates yet another desperate, sad and transparently liberal attempt to over-intellectualize the meaning of constitutional doctrine rather than simply redeem the destruction caused by Barack Obama’s fraudulent presidency.
Civil savagery comes in many forms, as Maskell demonstrates. Even in his opening, Maskell writes:
“There is no Supreme Court case which has ruled specifically on the presidential eligibility requirements…”
Here, Maskell implies incorrectly, that unless the judiciary approves it, presidential eligibility remains passive to interpretation. On the contrary, the constitution remains affirmative of the protections of American sovereignty, not passive to inclusiveness and plurality. The Constitution, rather than affording benefit of doubt under the absence of clarity, when the eligibility of a candidate is ambiguously defined, he or she is, by default, not eligible. Freedom to be declared a natural born American is available if circumstances and person are willing to provide such evidence of worthiness.
Contrary to this, however, Maskell’s fallow mooring portends as if legal constructs assume authority over political perception in the voter’s selection of a candidate. No legal mooring on earth will stabilize Obama’s political decline. Illegitimacy is greater than ineligibility at this point.
The weight of historical authority supporting the definition of “natural born” citizenship is distinct and unarguable based on common law which is a basic, most widely held understanding of doctrinal truth among a preeminent consensus, which are those who founded our Constitution. In this case, a “natural born” citizen is one who’s circumstances at birth prevent any legal or perceptible doubts as to his or her birthright to authority. Minimally...MINIMALLY...one must be born in a geographic location under the legal jurisdictions of the U.S. Constitution AND they must be naturally born unto parents who both are valid U.S. citizens at the time of birth.
As long as Obama remains, wrath will continue to store and vintage America will remain without executive representation in the world.
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
The Daily Pen
New York, NY - Herman Cain is a mortal threat to the liberal establishment because he demonstrates with vast clarity and merit that a black American has no need for the communist, neo-liberal doctrines of reparative justice in order to achieve economic equality and success. There is no greater threat to the socialist liberals now residing in the White House than an independently successful black American.
Cain achieved success because he is simply more superior than his competition, and his enemies know it.
Unlike Obama's Afro-Arab roots, Cain, having been raised in Southern American culture, is a true descendant of the legacy of slavery. Cain possesses unquestionable authority regarding matters of race-based politics. Even his enemies bow to this fact. Therefore, as a black descendant of Southern slaves, Obots understand Cain cannot be accused of racism, which is the preferred slur flung around by liberals against conservatives. So, liberal hacks working for Obama are instead attacking Cain's character using the only other possible weapon, albeit ineffective, they possess...sexual politics.
Sex and race. The binary ignorance of the shallow liberal psychosis.
Unfortunately for Obotic degenerates, the one thing they forgot in their sex-mongering attack on Cain is that America lost its appetite for this lurid crap 12 years ago, when they were forced to imagine the digusting scenerio of Bill Clinton standing in the Oval Office with his pants around his ankles as an intern took his "oral dictations". Do Cain haters honestly believe anyone is going to care what some liberal hit piece says after that hypocritical garbage? Bill Clinton makes accusations against Cain look like a Sunday at church.
Time to join adult society, liberals. Obama can't save you. "Hope and Change" is dead. Now, you are being forced to choke on the fact that just because you are offended, it does not mean anyone did anything offensive and the teeth-gnashing, universal truth for Obots is that America no longer allows their buddies in the liberal media to define what is offensive.
True to form, as we draw closer to the 2012 election and just as we predicted here at that The Daily Pen back in September, the first GOP presidential candidate has been targeted by the liberal media for character assassination. According to leftist sources, three faceless, nameless women are accusing GOP presidential candidate, Herman Cain, of offending them, while a fourth woman, Sharon Bialek, has come forward to make her accusations public.
Accompanied by women's rights attorney Gloria Allred, Bialek said in a press conference held on Monday, November 7, that she went public to "give a face and voice to those women who cannot or do not wish to come forward."
According to Bialek, she met Cain, the married father of two, in 1997 while Cain was head of the National Restaurant Association shortly after she had been fired from the organization in Chicago. In the wake of an investigation into the reasons why Bialek was fired, it has since been learned that she has ties to members of Obama's administration.
Bialek claims she agreed to have dinner with Cain to ask for help finding another position. She alleges that, upon leaving the restaurant, Cain physically assaulted her while making unwanted sexual advances.
Bialek did not provide evidence or reasons why she failed to file charges against Cain at the time, or why she chose to make her accusations public 14 years later just as Cain has become a leading candidate for the GOP presidential nomination.
"The timing is more curious than the content," says media analyst, Marian Taylor.
"One would expect such accusations to lead to some kind of criminal investigation when they actually occurred, if they are legitimate," Taylor says, "The whole affair seems a little too convenient. The fact that Gloria Allred is involved should be all America needs to understand where this trash comes from. Gloria Allred? Seriously?"
It makes you wonder what else Herman Cain did not do which he is accused of by anonymous gold diggers and liberal media carnival barkers.
Obama’s evil hordes have a lot to fear from Herman Cain. Cain’s access to untold monetary power so frightens the liberal establishment and Obama’s lapdog media that they will conjure any lie from their seething caldron in order to fight the exposure of the ultimate truth presiding against them. The truth being that Obama is a fraudulent president who has not only failed to ever demonstrate his eligibility to hold that office, but also has likewise and naturally failed at every task his usurped position has required him to perform. Obama is a true counterfeit hewn deep from the harbingers of liberal insidiousness, and Cain has the potential of bringing Obama's epic fraud into the domain of consciousness.
Recall, The Daily Pen wrote in September, 2011…”Obama’s existence is so threatened by Cain that the communist propaganda media wing of Obama’s illegitimate administration will very soon contrive a story in which sporadic, random and anonymous women or former children will actually and falsely levy their anonymous offendedness at Cain…Knowing all too well the character of liberals, I can confidently say it will most likely be women. They would rather not set the precedence of having anyone look into offenses against children. That hits too close to home for most liberals.
These women will be sought out by Obama’s liberal hacks for the very purpose of attempting to destroy Cain. They will be sought out because they will not come forward on their own either because they are not actually damaged or injured, or because of some former settlement Cain was forced to accept under false pretenses in order to avoid the cost of litigation. No matter what the liberal media packages and sells, the actual truth about these women will be twisted and maimed until the only vile message conveyed by the enemy is that Cain must have certainly committed an act of aggravated rape or sexual assault but for which there will never be any proof of actually happening. The proof of such accusations in this case will be in the twisted minds of those looking through the eyes of those who now, all of a sudden, claim to be offended.
It is an absolute certainty that the ignorant consumer of liberal sewage will never wonder why the so-called "victims" didn't have the courage or permission to come forward before Cain was a presidential candidate.
Therefore, my vintage American brothers and sisters, don’t be surprised when, in October or soon thereafter, some liberal media hackshop like MSNBC, ABC or CBS concocts a hit piece against Cain for political reasons but for which no affirming evidence will ever actually surface…Then , calmly remember who the messenger is and that the messenger is the one you should target for deletion from legitimacy, not Cain."
Herman Cain is the proverbial rock being thrown into the pack of liberal dogs. Now, all we have to do is listen for the ones who yelp the loudest..."
It’s good to be right about liberals.
The Truth About Race and Reparative Justice
The evil tactics used by liberals to maintain their illegitimate power should not surprise decent people. When the price for failure is the loss of their reparative justice agenda and a millenial reduction of their purpose, liberals must protect their little world at all costs. They have nothing else.
Remember, liberal reparative justice hinges upon their ability to keep minorities poor and convince ignorant masses that America is an offensive society in which slavery began. Liberal derangement forces its victims to lie about this history in order to make the case for compensation for their generational offendedness. Herman Cain is an exceptional American, first. Only by a twisted ideological bent does the liberal establishment insist that Cain's race should disqualify him from affluence and success in order maintain their theme of American oppression of black people. Cain utterly destroys this dysfunctional notion...and white, racist liberals hate him for it.
Where is the outrage of black leaders against white liberal attacks on Cain? Where is Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Whoopi Goldberg? Perhaps they need help with history.
Let's start at the beginning, not some random point in history which serves only some liberal psychosis.
Advances in anthropological science reveal that all modern descendants of early man come from geographic origins located on the continent now known as Africa. However, the dirty little secret which liberal pedagoguery and liars of modern political correction won’t tell the world is why today’s anglo-European societies, some of the smallest minorities on earth behind Asian and African demographics, now preside over the most powerful economies in human history. How has America been able to raise the quality of human existence while the rest of world languishes in their unwarranted hatred of us?
Somewhere in early human history, perhaps thousands of years ago, humanity's first "patriots" decided they did not want to be slaves any longer. They rose up...they fought and, at some point, they left Africa seeking freedom. They made new societies in the northern hemisphere and became pale skinned over generations, migrating through less arid climates. Eventually, those former slaves distinguished themselves as a new race apart from their former slavemasters. Then, perhaps in the mid second millenium or so, it was time to square the account. Descendants of former slaves became the slavemaster.
After 500 years of natural justice, in a place called America, around 1865, slavery ended despite the twisted lies from liberal minds that would have the world believe that slavery began in America. Slavery did not begin in America...it ended in America! The blood of more than 700,000 Americans was spilled over this issue and a Proclamation was signed by a Republican president as closure. Accounts paid in full.
Jump ahead to today. Herman Cain, a prominent black citizen of the highest credentials, has emerged as the pristine result of the actual legacy of economic equality after the death of slavery, among all races.
Reparative justice has been achieved by Herman Cain and this is what so terrifies the liberal establishment. Cain achieved economic justice in a way that makes him the greatest threat to liberals than any other person on the planet. He earned it and, thereby, was exonerated by his own merit. He did not seek payment from others for nothing. He set out to define himself as exeptional based on his own equity as a man of equal opportunity. He did not see himself as a victimized black man entitled to reparative justice.
This is why Herman Cain is a mortal threat to liberals. He is the living embodiment of evidence which completely destroys the liberal case for reparative justice which relies solely on the justification for confiscation of the wealth of others through government taxation to compensate offended blacks. Cain became wealthy and successful without stealing, begging or borrowing beyond his means. How's that for black role modeling?
Cain's message to the black race is one which white liberals will never embrace because white liberals are the actual racists of American society. Cain's life narrative to black people says, "I am what you can be come too if you will reject entitlement mentality, fight against socialism, embrace freedom and become what your God-given gifts intended for you."
Obama's bowing hordes need their chosen black icon to be the bearer of such justice...not an actual successful person like Cain. Liberals want a shadow creature like Obama to bear the lie of their message which says that reparative justice must be taken from those only we are offended by. In seeking reparative justice, however, liberals refuse to acknowledge the truth as it was prior to their shallow, ignorant, American slavery-era moorings. Beyond this time, when faced by the entire body of truth which presides, liberal reparative justice is rendered meaningless and contrived.
Today, liberal degenerates have hijacked the American media complex and they are going to use everything in their insidiously evil box of implements to undermine real leaders like Herman Cain.
Decent American people must first remember, and never forget, that liberals are the actual racists of our species. They were the first to incorporate racism under the guise of social justice seeking recompense for their version of what they think constitutes “fairness” for everyone. Liberal shame lies in their ignorance to remain in only the moment which serves their selfish entitlement derangement. This recent attack on Cain is the quintessential example of liberal racism and hatred.
Vintage Americans are the descendants of the first slaves who fled north out of the African continent, away from their African slave masters, seeking inhabitance in freedom from their oppressors. Herman Cain is the descendant of the first generation of slavemasters who were forgiven long ago. Generations later, the races of the earth began settling a prehistoric score which transcends idiotic liberal ideology cultivated in the fraudulent idea that America alone, somehow, invented slavery.
These are the same gangrenous hordes who have conjured offended women to smear Herman Cain.
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
by Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen
New York, NY - Compared to Obama, Herman Cain is independently affluent, functionally superior, constitutionally legitimate, fiscally respected and, worst of all for degenerates on the left…he’s “blacker” than Obama.
For Obots lost in their insidious reparative justice ideology, Cain’s skin color presents the teeth-gnashing reality that, of course, he is more entitled to their form of race-based eco-favoritism than Obama. However, the real threat of Cain’s candidacy is the fullness of his “blackness” compared to his half-bred opponent. Unfortunately, this inconvenient demography exposes liberals’ racism against Cain because they understand that he will be the actual first truly pure black, eligible, American President, not Obama.
White liberals, especially, are reluctantly copacetic with Obama because he resides tidily within their hyper-racial delusion as a mere biracial, half-black, liberal manservant possessing cultural plurality and ambiguous bona fides who was willing to do their socialist bidding. Obama is acceptable to liberals because they feel proximal enough to one half of his race, being able to exploit it to promote their ideological hate, but not close enough, culturally, to have to expect exceptionalism from the other half. For what good is an exceptional black man or black woman to a liberal? To a liberal, such an individual is a traitor…an uncle Tom.
Cain, on the other hand, is exceptional because of the content of his character. The color of his skin is just the rusty sword upon which, by happenstance, falls the heart of liberal idiocy, the lesson being ‘judge not, lest you be judged by the same standard’. Cain is that judgment. Can I get an amen?
Obama is just some guy with no history and no real identity who was able to be sculpted into a liberal cause for destruction and blood lust. Unlike Cain, Obama has no character except that which was conjured by others for his momentary service as nothing more than a pack mule for what will eventually become the greatest of failed economic policies in human history.
However, unlike Obama, Cain is a genuine black man, born from a pure American black womb and established in vintage American heritage through a southern-based traditional family structure ruled by a strong, monogamous, black father. The possibility of such a man being poised to assume such executive honor, relegates the political left to babbling nonperformance. Cain’s apocalypse reveals the sanctimonious, race-based psychosis of liberals.
The left can’t make sense of a man like Herman Cain, and that is the delicious part of Cain’s persona. To denounce Cain is to denounce themselves as the liars and hypocrites the rest of humanity already knows they are. Otherwise, they risk being convicted as the abject racists they are unable to accuse Cain of being.
Which man serves the greater need for a role model among black Americans? An ill-conceived identity thief who fraudulently acquired marginally legal opportunities during his epically illegitimate ascendance over a psychotic, bowing liberal consensus? Or, a vintage American descendant of southern black culture who rose from poverty by immaculate parental stewardship to acquire a self-endowed, domestically funded education and become a preeminent business leader in America?
What does a Cain presidency mean to liberals?
1. Eligibility Begets Legitimacy
2. The End of Accusing Republicans of "Racism"
3. Capitalism In The White House
4. Cain Actually Held the Title of Chief Executive Before Becoming President
5. Cain Is Everything Liberals Want...But Can Never Have
6. Cain is the First True Role Model for Minorities in America
7. Cain Does Not Need to Lie About His Past
8. Cain's Transgressions are Forgivable
9. Cain is Not Afraid to Promote a Plan for Recovery
10. Cain is Blacker Than Obama
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
FORMER ABETTOR OF OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY FRAUD, LEFTIST NYT COLUMNIST, NOW WANTS OFF THE 'HOPE AND CHANGE' CARNIVAL RIDE
The Liberal Defection Begins: With the collapse of green jobs darling, Solyndra and GE's growing struggles in the alternative energy market, Obama's illegitimate presidency is manifesting with destructive consequences to leftist interests and personal welfare of former liberal media propagandists, like David Brooks of the New York Times. Now, he, and many like him in the media are seeking asylum in the graces of repentant contrition. Unfortunately, for Brooks, simply admitting he was wrong does not repair the damage done by his passive egress to Obama.
commentary by Pen Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen
New York, NY - As hard as I try, I can’t bring myself to imagine Obama shedding a tear when he is forced to admit that he is the greatest fraud in history.
To creatures like Obama, failure to maintain a deception about his nefarious identity is simply a bump in the long ideological road upon which such a radical cause for twisted justice slowly crawls. As ghosts like Obama pass away, the evil cause is simply taken up by the next radical change agent who happens to fall in the hole left after reckless incompetence is momentarily eradicated.
Obama is nothing to those controlling this epic story. He is just one of a slew of humanity’s failed liars possessing delusions of grandeur about creating his own world upon the equity of others.
Obama's sense of entitlement to determine what is fair for all is rooted in his birth. Conceived in bi-racial illegitimacy by a wayward teenage mother and a foreign, dead-beat, alchoholic womanizer, Obama was born with an identity he did not want. Rather than beholding himself as a whole person of multicultural merit, he became entrenched in liberal radicalism and, thereby, chose to attach his worth to a false understanding about his racially half-bred, disadvantaged youth. This identity spoke a message of inferiority, not equality, to him. As a result, Obama is afraid of being seen as inferior. One only needs to examine his inflated language and over educated contempt for vintage, white American heritage.
A perfect example of this delusion is Obama's myopic insistance that the only possible way to implement fairness in taxation between the rates paid by secretaries and the millionaires who employ them is to increase the rates of those he believes don't pay their fair share. This liberal tenet exposes such a blind spot in Obama it is laughable, which is this:
Why is it that Obama's only considered option in implementing tax fairness is to RAISE the taxes of the American's he thinks are not paying their fair share. How about the novel concept of LOWERING the taxes of those he thinks pay too much?
This is what liberalism does to the human mind. It corrupts it...blinds it and then it destroys it.
Herman Cain's declaration of his GOP candidacy against Obama will soon demonstrate a reaction from the liberal establishment which will further reveal how depraved Obama's kind really are.
Obama’s existence is so threatened by Cain that the communist propaganda media wing of Obama’s illegitimate administration will very soon contrive a story in which sporadic, random and anonymous women or former children will actually and falsely levy their anonymous offendedness at Cain…Knowing all too well the character of liberals, I can confidently say it will most likely be women. They would rather not set the precedence of having anyone look into offenses against children. That hits too close to home for most liberals.
These women will be sought out by Obama’s liberal hacks because they will not come forward on their own either because they are not actually damaged or injured, or because of some former settlement Cain was forced to accept in order to avoid the cost of litigation. No matter what the liberal media packages and sells, the actual truth about these women will be twisted and maimed until the only vile message conveyed by our enemy is that Cain must have certainly committed an act of aggravated rape or sexual assault but for which there will never be any proof of actually happening. The proof of such accusations in this case will be in the twisted minds of those looking through the eyes of those who claim to be offended.
Therefore, my vintage American brothers and sisters, don’t be surprised when, in October or soon thereafter, some liberal media hackshop like MSNBC, ABC or CBS concocts a hit piece against Cain for political reasons but for which no affirming evidence will ever actually surface…Then , calmly remember who the messenger is and that the messenger is the one you should target for deletion from legitimacy, not Cain.
Herman Cain is the proverbial rock being thrown into the pack of liberal dogs. Now, all we have to do is listen for the ones who yelp the loudest and, then, summarily euthanize them.
Obama's inferiority complex is so deep-seated, it prompted him to disseminate the greatest lie in American political history in order to hide the truth about who he really is. The liberal media, including the New York Times, helped him tell that lie by refusing to investigate blatant evidence of Obama's deception.
Apparently, however, some of Obama’s abettors may be having a change of heart.
New York Times Op-Ed columnist and long standing Obama shill, David Brooks is coming to his personal apocalypse over his support for the Chosen One. Brooks, like slews of degenerate leftists who once sold their soul to the idea of a messianic Obama and his message of hope and change, is realizing the a terrible mistake he made.
In his recent op-ed on September 19, 2011, Brooks states, “I’m a sap, a specific kind of sap. I’m an Obama Sap.”
If Brooks were a thinking man, he would have researched the term “SAP” and found that one of its definitions is known to political strategists as a “Self Avoiding Polygon”. This refers to an exercise in which a single line is drawn on a multipoint lattice in a way that connects all the dots but which requires the allowance of gaps in each row and column of dots of the lattice.
The concept of "self avoiding gaps" has a significant part in Mr. Brooks' lamentations about the Fallen One, Obama.
Brooks continued, “When the president said the unemployed couldn’t wait 14 more months for help and we had to do something right away, I believed him. When administration officials called around saying that the possibility of a double-dip recession was horrifyingly real and that it would be irresponsible not to come up with a package that could pass right away, I believed them.”
Now Brooks is wondering what other lies and misinformation he may have believed about Obama without actually taking the time to investigate the truth.
Perhaps Brooks believed that Obama was actually eligible to be president. Perhaps he believed that Obama was verified as a Natural Born candidate, as required by the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps Brooks was blinded by ideology to such depth and decrepitude that not even he was able to see the teeth-gnashing reality now being wrought by such stored wrath.
Get ready. David Brooks is about to go from a ‘sap’…to an unadulterated ass.
“Yes, I’m a sap,” Brooks states, “I believed Obama when he said he wanted to move beyond the stale ideological debates that have paralyzed this country. I always believe that Obama is on the verge of breaking out of the conventional categories and embracing one of the many bipartisan reform packages that are floating around.”
Brooks, like many liberal abettors, made the initial mistake of taking for granted that Obama was a legitimately qualified candidate. They willfully ignored evidence of Obama's ineligibility because they hated Obama's predecessor so much. Their hatred for Bush was so visceral, it consumed their morality in vengeance. They wanted to see Bush humiliated, damaged or, for very many vile outcasts of the more extreme fringe of the liberal establishment, worse. They would have voted for Charles Manson if it was discovered the convicted mass murderer was a Democrat. Hell, they would have voted for Manson even if he was a Republican. Anyone but Bush to them was worthy. Even a deceiver like Obama.
Clearly disappointed in Obama, Brooks continues by trying to objectify his political rivals, “But remember, I’m a sap. The White House has clearly decided that in a town of intransigent Republicans and mean ideologues, it has to be mean and intransigent too. The president was stung by the liberal charge that he was outmaneuvered during the debt-ceiling fight. So the White House has moved away from the Reasonable Man approach or the centrist Clinton approach.”
I've known Mr. Brooks' work for many years. His capacity for reason is always available but seemingly, inexplicably abbreviated. He remains willfully ignorant about Obama's biographical testimony because he is afraid of what the truth will do to his fragile mind over the subject. Sadly, Brooks also remains perpetually locked in his absurd ideological prison, now trapped with his chosen eternity as an Obama robot.
If I might address Mr. Brooks directly, here’s the universal truth. Republicans aren’t intransigent, as you desperately wish to showcase. Republican stubborness is merely the lame hitch upon which you desperately wish to hook your excuse for Obama. You don't get off that easy. Sorry.
Republicans aren't stubborn, they are just simply right. When you are as right as they are, you don't have to compromise with those who are wrong. You simply only need to appeal to the moral depth of humanity in the course of conveying the simple truth. They are right about America and they are right about Obama, whether they can muster the courage to admit it in public or not.
Republicans didn’t have to “outmaneuver” Obama, as you believe they attempted. Obama was just the fraud by which righteousness achieves distinction. Obama made this easy for conservatives. They were already riding the straight and narrow, albeit bumby, rut in reverse away from the chasm when Obama shifted into "D" and drove the country out of that rut and completely off the cliff. Yes, in his narrative about driving a car, "R" means Reverse to Obama, but reverse is a hell of lot better when your headed over the edge. Obama is shifting us into "D" and giving it gas!
Your corrupted perspective makes it seem like any divergence between Obama and his rivals must, of course, mean that there is maneuvering or erratic positioning going on. However, the tragic, hard truth for lost people like you is that appearance of divergence is just your Obama love train going off the rails into oblivion while the rest of us continue on the Express in the other direction, toward the only viable destination.
You see, David, America was not founded upon deception and lies. It became manifest by the natural consequence of the blood ransom paid by those worthier of higher positions than anyone living today can achieve. Your failure to understand this is the very same reason why you supported a radical subversive alias like Barack Obama.
Obama is the king of liars, and you believed him. Unfortunately, for many, including you, Obama must have been an effective liar. For vintage Americans, like myself, I saw Obama's lies the very moment I witnessed his announcement to run for president on that cold February day in Springfield. I was there. Where were you?
Sorry. The truth hurts. I truly hope you survive the impact. You seem like a decent fellow. However, if you don’t, I can’t feel sorry for you. We tried to tell you the truth about Obama for years and you mocked us, derided us, hated us and called us all kinds of vile names.
So, take your medicine. You deserve far worse than a broken heart over a fraud like Obama. You deserve to have Obama as your only savior…
You, Mr. Brooks, are not only a sap for Obama, you now have to face that you, and your newspaper, were also a tool used for your capacity as a dimwitted medium so lustfully willing to channel the destruction of the most fraudulent politician in world history. You availed yourself to this cause, not because of your affirmation of Obama…but because of your hatred for his predecessor. Now, that hatred has become mete with your desire for it. It has matured into a full recompense for your loyalty in nuturing it. It has become Barack Obama.
Don’t be disappointed that Obama isn’t the person you wanted him to be. Be ashamed that Obama isn’t the man he should have been when called to be so, and that you vigorously supported him in his deception. You allowed him to continue his lies, unabated, unrequited and unchallenged. Well, you wanted him. Now, you can have him.
From that plummeting perspective, being a sap might be something you should think about holding on to...as hard as you can.
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
SHOCKING PROOF OF OBAMA’S ILLEGITIMACY SHOWS FORGED 2008 COLB IMAGE HE COPIED FROM INTERNET WAS NOT AN OFFICIAL HAWAIIAN HEALTH RECORD
PRESIDENCY IN PERIL: Recent testimony from computer imagery expert demonstrates Obama posted the same copy of that expert’s actual, publicly disclosed, intentional forgery to the whitehouse.gov website, complete with incriminating links containing the name of the forger, then promoted it as a scanned image of an authentic document sent to Obama by the State of Hawaii.
By Pen Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen
New York, NY - An expert in document imaging who has been investigating the chain of evidence showing Obama’s ineligibility as President since 2008 has revealed that his very own forged rendition of Obama’s 2008 “Certification of Live Birth” was accessed and copied by the White House then posted and promoted by Obama as an authentic image of the then presidential candidate’s official, authentic and only birth certificate issued to him directly by the Hawaiian Department of Health.
Dr. Ron Polland, Ph.D., bearing almost 30 years of expertise in document imaging and instructional technology, has posted a new video on YouTube.com attesting that the document image of a “Certification of Live Birth”, (known as a short-form birth certificate or COLB), which he created almost three years ago, was actually the very same image used by the White House, accessed and copied by a White House computer system administrator sometime before April 27, 2011. See Polland's video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN2cy1YU1A0
Polland created and posted the image of the fake COLB in 2008, fully disclosing at that time that his image was a forgery, in order to demonstrate for the American public how the Obama White House was able to counterfeit an image made to appear like an official Hawaiian Health Department birth record. The fact that the White House posted Polland's image in lieu of an actual record from the Hawaiian Health Department suggests that Polland's counterfeit was undetectable even to Obama's technology experts.
Unfortunately for Obama and the hordes of liberals shilling for him, it also suggests that any document posted to the internet can be forged...especially a Hawaiian birth certificate, like the "Certificate of Live Birth" revealed on April 27th, 2011 and endorsed by every mainstream media network and Obama administration official, including Obama, himself. Since this document image was revealed, more than two dozen nationally renowned experts have conferred and testified that it is a forgery.
Dr. Polland says he originally posted the image, as part of his technical analysis, to the pro-Obama website, www.snopes.com which, in turn, promoted the image as the actual “Certification of Live Birth” released to Obama by the State of Hawaii. At some point, the Obama White House copied Polland's forgery and promoted it as authentic on the whitehouse.gov site.
"If Obama has his 'Certification of Live Birth' and his 2008 presidential campaign had actually scanned it and posted it on their website FightTheSmears.com, then why did the White House distribute on April 27 a fake copy ... that the White House never had and never made?" Polland asked during an interview with Dr. Jerome Corsi of World Net Daily.
"Instead, the White House distributed a fake short-term certificate image that I had and I made.”
As reported by Corsi at www.wnd.com, "...when the White House posted online an image of President Obama's purported long-form birth certificate, it also linked to the previously circulated "Certification of Live Birth," the short-form version that had been presented as the only birth documentation available."
Corsi's story continues..."However, the short-form certificate to which the White House linked April 27 was a forgery, claims research expert Ron Polland, Ph.D., who says he made the image himself."
The WND story goes on to show, with graphic evidence and copies of screen shots taken by Polland, that the White House endorsed Polland’s demonstrative forgery as an authenticated image of an original document which it then claimed was issued by the State of Hawaii, despite the fact that the embedded computer link shown with the image demonstrates irrefutably that it was actually posted to the Snopes site by Dr. Polland.
So, why did Obama’s White House copy an unverified image of an alleged official document, which is actually a forgery, from a publicly accessible computer network address, Snopes.com, and then post it to the official Whitehouse.gov web site telling the American people that it was an original version sent to them directly from a government agency in Hawaii?
The answer to that question suggests:
A.) the White House was never issued an official "Certification of Live Birth" document from the State of Hawaii or,
B.) the document which was issued by the State of Hawaii contained information which reveals that Obama is either constitutionally ineligible to be president or that he is a political fraud and, therefore, the White House decided to use Polland's image as a "front" by which it could excuse itself from having to show the original, essentially claiming they posted what they had and that it was not their fault it was hacked and forged.
Meanwhile, the brood of vipers slithers on.
The bottom line is that the White House led everyone to believe that the 2008 image of a "Certification of Live Birth" posted to various left wing sites was a scanned image of an original document it was sent by the Hawaiian Department of Health in 2008. There is no escaping that death knell.
In June, 2010, then White House Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs actually confirmed in a televised press conference with the White House press corp that he, himself, had seen the "birth certificate" and that he, himself, had put the document on the internet.
"I've seen the real birth certificate, and...I put it on the internet," said Gibbs referring to the Certification of Live Birth posted by Polland. Ironically, Gibbs' comment was made in response to an original question from correspondent, Les Kinsolving, about Obama's fraudulent use of a Connecticut Social Security number, not a question about a birth certificate. See Gibbs statement at the 1:30 mark of the YouTube video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8Aahw3NT6E
Gibbs has stonewalled and avoided answering all questions as to why he admitted to intentionally or knowingly posted a forgery to the White House web site.
However, since Obama's horde has no idea which image is authentic and which is a forgery, why should anyone believe any document image posted to the internet about Obama's birth records.
In other words, if this administration is incompetent to such a degree as to actually use a forged image without examining or verifying it...or, at least conceal the data path linking the image to the forger, while copying it not from an official, protected agency website but from a left wing computer network site which has been shown to promote a liberal ideology in defending Obama, how then is America ever to believe that Obama is competent enough to actually be an eligible president?
Only in the minds of the dissonant is the asking of this question allowed to remain denounced, while the blood-ransomed facts cry for it to be answered.
As of Wednesday afternoon, Snopes.com was berated by thousands of emails inquiring as to why the site authenticated a forgery of an official municipal document without checking with the Hawaiian Department of Health, first.
It now appears the 2008 “Certification of Live Birth” circulated by Snopes, Daily Kos, Fight The Smears, Huffington Post, Salon and other radical, left-wing hack sites, is yet another lie by the ineligible usurper also known as Barack Obama.
Sadly, Obama liberals have such an inflated sense self-importance and elitism, they cannot even see how stupid the daily mounting evidence is making them look. Even as Obama's approval rating rapidly approaches unrelectable territory.
Tuesday, August 9, 2011
By Pen Johannson,
Editor of the Daily Pen
New York, NY - Upon service of a court ordered subpoena by California attorney, Orly Taitz and associates, on August 8, 2011, the Hawaiian Health Department confirmed that it is unable to provide documented proof that Barack Obama was born in that state and therefore he is an unconstitutional, undocumented holder of the office of the President.
Working to confirm Obama's real natal identity, investigators have put forth requests for corroboration of any record pertaining to Obama's Hawaiian birth to several hospitals in Honolulu. All medical facilities have also confirmed that no records have been discovered in their respective archives showing that Barack Obama or his mother, Ann Dunham, were ever patients in those facilities. In fact, no hospital in the United States or its governed territories has ever attested to Obama's birth in their facility.
It has become apparent that Barack Obama and the liberal establishment have trapped themselves in a very perilous corner. After releasing an obvious counterfeit of a mere image of what they claim was an official, original government issued “Certificate of Live Birth” on April 27th, 2011, complete with extraneous graphics, spelling errors, cryptic symbols and unofficial artifacts, the Hawaiian Department of Health is now unable to produce that same original ‘vault’ version of the document from which with the image was produced.
Having argued for more than four years that Barack Obama is a natural-born citizen, and therefore eligible to be president, despite irrefutable evidence to the contrary, his blindest of incompetent supporters have had no other choice but to promote the unsubstantiated claim that the State of Hawaii’s Health Department possesses an original version of Barack Obama’s 1961, NVSD, hospital generated “Certificate of Live Birth”.
Unfortunately, Obama's lies and epic fraud have impugned these claims by narrowing the probative field to the following overweighted condition: The only way Obama can possibly be eligible and legitimate to be president is if the Hawaiian Health Department possesses this original document in its archive files...and, to the horror of officials of the Hawaiian Health Department, it must match the counterfeit forgery posted to the White House computer systems on April 27th, 2011, complete with "smiley face" graffiti, spelling errors, extraneous artifacts and an over enlarged safety-paper border.
This is what happens when you lie. You must forge new lies to explain the previous lie.
However, the State of Hawaii is unable to provide this proof for the simple reason that it does not exist. Therefore, Obama has violated Constitutional law and perpetrated a crime against the United States of America.
Foremost, even the forged image confirms that Obama’s stated father was not a U.S. citizen, thereby disqualifying Obama’s claims to natural-born citizenship. A natural-born citizen is one who is born in a location under the protection of the U.S. Constitution to TWO U.S. citizen parents and maintains the continuity of their natural-born status without interruption by any legal or administrative procedure such as expatriation, foreign adoption or extradition.
Only the offices of the President and Vice President are required to be held by natural-born citizens. If Obama is a native-born citizen, or a naturalized citizen, he is eligible to serve in any other capacity in local, state or federal goverment. He just can't be president.
Radicals on the political left, commonly referred to as "Obots", have leveraged illicit arguments against Obama's eligibilty contenders by futility attempting to frame the entire saga under claims of persecution against his demographics and bi-racial heritage.
Unfortunately for these ideological degenerates, the simplicity of the entire argument resides well founded in the fact that Obama is merely ineligible to be president. However, when the truth emerges, despite his criminal usurpation of a position for which he does not qualify, it remains certain that he shall be allowed to exist as a member of the human race, even as a vanquished wretch.
Theoretically, if the Hawaiian Health Department had actually possessed an exact replica of the original document from which the fraudulent image of the April 27, 2011 document was produced, the State of Hawaii would have to admit to being an accomplice to the greatest fraud ever perpetrated in American history. Multiple, highly credible document and imagery experts from several industries have conferred in complete agreement and publicly proclaimed that the image is either of a forged document or a forged image created after the document was digitally scanned and posted in digital image form on the White House’s own website.
The fact that the corruption of the image occurred while it remained in the warranted chain custody of the White House from the hands of officials in Hawaii to its secure internet site means that Obama owns this document image from conception to revelation.
“There is no way out of that for him,” says media analysis expert, Marian Taylor. “He owns it, forever. If he claims it is a forgery, he then has to explain how the forgery occurred on his own secure computer systems, or he has blame the State of Hawaii.”
“Much like Anthony Weiner’s ‘my account was hacked’ defense. And, now, we all know the truth about Weiner, don’t we?” she added.
If Obama attempted this escape route regarding the forgery posted on April 27th, he has no way of explaining how someone accessed the digital image on a secure White House site, vandalized it, then reposted it without any of the "geniuses" in his adminstration noticing. However, on August 8, 2011, it was confirmed the State of Hawaii is unable to produce this document, as evident from its inability to comply with the court order.
Lex parsimoniae wins that dull argument every time.
On another hand, Taylor says that if the Hawaiian Health Department possesses a version of a different original birth document, showing different information and appearance from the image posted to the White House’s network computer system on April 27th, then Obama is a liar and a counterfeiter and, therefore, merely a criminal of the lowest order.”
“At this point, I really don’t consider Barack Obama to be a president as much as I consider him to be just another inferior ideologue seeking notoriety by attempting to fraudulently attach his self to American exceptionalism,” says Taylor.
“He’s made the entire image of American leadership a joke to the world,” says Taylor.
“However, the mistake he has made is assuming he can affect lasting change as a member of our government, whereas American history has demonstrated, time and time and time again, that the real power to bring justice and punishment lies not in government but with the advance citizenship of people of vintage American heritage. The descendants of our warrior class generation.”
Taylor continued, “In my 25 years in media and technology, I have never seen such a blatant case justifying the complete delegitimization of a political heretic, as with this man. It’s repulsively fascinating how this individual even found his way into public service at the local level, let alone in a position to trespass on the highest executive office. That’s what happens when authentic people allow illegitimate candidates to come to power.”
The ever-reliable bastion of truth known as “the internet” has been the sole representative and primary medium bearing the factual substance of the Obama’s eligibility to be president. Absurdly, Barack Obama invested his legitimacy as a politician on the content of nothing more than digital document images posted onto a large computer network which can be accessed by anyone and, for which, the published content remains unaccountable to anyone specific.
Never has a public figure been allowed to exploit such a fallible technology as a tool for conveying such fraudulent information in world history. It’s laughable.
During this horrific Obama era in American history, it is important to acknowledge that many president’s have been accused of being liars under the guise of ideology and policy. None, however, have been so subject to such a vast probative supply of evidence showing that they are a fraud, like Barack Obama.
Undeniably, at a minimum, Barack Obama is a liar, in the political sense, and, therefore, unworthy of his place in leadership. At most, he is the most renowned criminal fraud in American history and, therefore, is subject to legal prosecution.
Despite the strain Obama has placed on the account of grace, the man must be civily and endurably processed from office, prosecuted for his crimes.
It is paramount for Americans to embrace that this tedious exercise of removing usurper Obama from American history serves well the purfication of our rites of sovereignty while fortifying the value of our blood-ransomed heritage, which has endowed freedom upon the face of the earth for millions...for centuries.
Never forget that America was created and has since been defended by the members of the advanced citizenship of humanity. A nation like America is what happens as a natural consequence when the highest qualified members of humanity come together, under God, and form a union based on unalienable rights enabled by reliance upon divine providence.